Hillary Had a Hand in Releasing Terrorists
Feb 12, 2008 Political
Before anyone buys into the bunk that Hillary Clinton will be tough on terrorists they should take a step back and look at how she helped to have a bunch of them released in order to garner the Puerto Rican vote in New York.
Bill Clinton was soft on terror and he ignored every attack on our country. His cowardice with regard to Somalia gave bin Laden the incentive he needed to attack us on 9/11.
We all know that Bill Clinton pardoned a lot of political cronies on his last day in office but he also gave clemency to a group of FALN members who were responsible for bombings in New York that killed a lot of people. Clinton, with his wife’s help, released these people at the request of three members of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, local Hispanic politicians and some activist groups and it was all in order to help her win the Senate seat in New York.
When there was a public outcry Hillary distanced herself from the very decision she helped make in order to put it all on him and ensure she won. These people will take a bullet for each other so long as a win is in it for the other. Power is all they care about and they sold out the families of those killed as well as other victims in order to gain that power.
These are the kind of people that want to occupy our White House once again. They have sold their souls to Satan and are now hell bent on ruining this country. They allowed killers to go, killers that did not want to go and did not want to agree to the terms of release.
I wonder what would happen if these people killed again. One can guess what it would be if my family was the victim.
The Wall Street Journal has a great article about this. It is well worth the read.
Tags: clemency, Clinton, FALN, political favors, terrorists
With Muslims there are no Equal Rights
Feb 7, 2008 General
It is no surprise that Muslims do not have equality between the sexes. They treat their women as having little value except as a vessel with which to repopulate. It is also true that the Muslim world does not treat non Muslims with equality. In the Muslim world they refuse to allow churches to be built and if there is one that gets damaged it is not allowed to be replaced. Never mind the idea of a synagogue. In the Muslim world non Muslims are killed because of their religion. The simple act of possessing a Bible could result in a death sentence.
Recently, an American business woman was arrested in Saudi Arabia because she sat with her male colleagues in a Starbucks coffee shop. She was arrested, taken to jail, strip searched, placed in a filthy jail cell where her clothes had been thrown in some muck and she was forced to sign a confession. All of this because some stone aged people did not like her sitting with men. It is their law so I suppose people should follow it. How do you think they would feel about imposing our laws over there? They would certainly be against it and yet they want Sharia law imposed in non Muslim countries.
The Muslims do not play by the same rules either. They come here (or other civilized countries) and if a Muslim woman is required to remove her burqa for some reason the Muslims go nuts and they threaten protests. Anytime they are required to follow a law that disagrees with their beliefs they raise a stink and CAIR shows up talking about the Muslim haters in America.
I would never let my wife go to one of those filthy places for any reason, business or not. First of all I would not want her around all those filthy, smelly, camel jockeys. Second of all I would not take kindly to my wife being treated improperly by these stone aged barbarians. I can’t understand why anyone does business there and certainly cannot understand how people tolerate the backstabbing goat herders they pass off as men.
Screw them all.
Source:
Times UK
Tags: camel jockeys, Muslims, Sharia Law, terrorists
Don’t Take Flight 93 to Mecca Redux
Oct 31, 2007 Flight 93
Lying about the 44 blocks
When Tom Burnett Sr. came out against the Flight 93 Memorial, the press asked architect Paul Murdoch if there were really going to be 44 inscribed translucent blocks emplaced along the flight path (equaling the number of passengers, crew, AND terrorists). Murdoch acknowledged 43 of the blocks, but denied knowing about a 44th:
[T]here are 40 inscribed marble panels listing the names of the passengers and crew at the gateway to the Sacred Ground, where their remains still rest.
There is then an opening in the wall, Mr. Murdoch said, and three additional panels, which would include the date, Sept. 11, 2001.
“Where the other one is being fabricated, I don’t know,” he said.
Yes he does. Paul Murdoch is fully aware of the large dedicatory glass block at the end of the Entry Portal Walkway:
Man and child stand in front of the 44th block, which forms the railing at the end of the Entry Portal Walkway. The glass block will be inscribed: “A field of honor forever.” This Walkway provides visitors with their first view of the inside of the giant crescent. (From the Entry Portal page of the original design PDFs. Click pic for wider view.)
The flight path
The Entry Portal Walkway is built along the flight path. It signifies, in Paul Murdoch’s own description, the terrorists breaking the circle and turning it into a giant crescent. The flight path then continues down to the crash site, which sits in the middle of the mouth of the giant crescent (in roughly the position of the star on an Islamic crescent and star flag).
Just before the impact point is the Memorial Wall, also built along the flight path. This two part wall is where the other 43 blocks will be placed (the ones described by Paul Murdoch above):
The forty translucent blocks that run horizontally through the left hand section of wall (closest to the impact crater) will be inscribed with the names of the forty murdered heroes. The three on the right will be inscribed with the 9/11 date. (From the Sacred Ground Plaza page of the original design PDF’s. Click pic for larger image. The alternating white and gray depicts the zig zag layout of the translucent blocks.)
Challenged by the father of one of our murdered heroes, Murdoch told a desperate lie, feigning ignorance of one of the most prominent features of his own design: the huge glass block that dedicates the entire site. This should have been the end of his hijack attempt, but Murdoch’s deception was abetted by both the Memorial Project and the press.
The abettors
“That has been disproved so many times,” said Bill Hayworth, the Memorial Project’s PR flack, when asked about the 44 blocks. Would it have been too much for reporters to ask for this proof?
In fact Murdoch is the first one to ever even deny that there are 44 glass blocks on the flight path. The only earlier Memorial Project statement about the 44 blocks was from Project Manager Jeff Reinbold, who told Alec Rawls in an April 2006 conference call that the giant glass block can’t be counted with the small glass blocks because it is bigger: “If we are going to count the big glass block with the small glass blocks,” he said, “then we have to count the windows in the visitor center too.” (Crescent of Betrayal, download 3, p. 146.)
“The windows in the visitor center are not on the flight path,” Rawls replied. He never said they were all the same size, and he never said there are no other panes of glass in the Memorial. Reinbold’s silly dodges do not contradict Rawls’ 44 glass blocks claim in any way.
The press was also in on the deception. Kecia Bal, the reporter who quoted Hayworth’s dismissal of the 44 blocks claim had already verified the block count for herself. Mr. Rawls had earlier sent her close ups of all 44. She responded with a request for copies of the original design PDFs, so she could check the veracity of these close-ups for herself.
When Bal quoted Hayworth, she knew he was wrong, and allowed him to mislead the public by suppressing her own fact checking of the 44 blocks. People can think that the 44 blocks are innocuous if they want, but lying about the block count certainly is not innocuous. Similarly for many the other lies that are being told in defense of the crescent design.
Memorial Project members insist that it is just coincidence that a person facing directly into the giant crescent will be facing almost exactly at Mecca, but that isn’t what they are telling the public. They are telling the newspapers that the Mecca-orientation claim is false, while acknowledging amongst themselves that the Mecca orientation is real.
Again and again Murdoch, the Memorial Project and the press are lying in concert to cover up the facts of the design. Some people will be unsure what to make of the many suspicious features of the crescent design but no one should doubt the need to expose and condemn those who lie about the facts.
So what can we do? Write, phone or fax the memorial project.
Flight 93 National Memorial
109 West Main Street
Suite 104
Somerset, PA 15560
(814) 443-4557 Phone
(814) 443-2180 Fax
Memorial Project Chairman, John Reynolds
jreynoldsparks@comcast.net
John Reynolds
Project Superintendent Joanne Hanley at joanne_hanley@nps.gov
click here to email Joanne Hanley
Project Manager Jeff Reinbold at jeff_reinbold@nps.gov
click here to email Jeff Reinbold
Chief Ranger Jill Hawk (who conducted the phony internal investigation) at jill_hawk@nps.gov
Park Service spokesman Phil Sheridan at Phil_Sheridan@nps.gov
click here to email Phil Sheridan
Director, Northeast sector of Park Service (oversees Memorial Project) Mary Bomar at mary_bomar@nps.gov
click here to email Mary Bomar
Communications officer, National Park Service Gary Gaumer at Gerry_Gaumer@nps.gov
click here to email Gerry Gaumer
o emailing all of them at once:
click here to email all of the above
Be respectful, use your own words, but clearly send the message that you agree with Tom Burnett, Sr., that they should respect his wishes that his son’s name should be kept off the memorial, and that a more appropriate memorial should be constructed on the crash site; one that doesn’t memorialize the terrorists because in Flight 93 National Memorial Act, Pub. L. No. 107-226, the purpose of the memorial is spelled out: it is to honor the passengers and crew of the flight, and the last section of the law excludes the terrorists from the definition of passengers and crew.
If you need more to write about, watch this movie.
If you want to join the growing list of bloggers:
- in objecting to planting an Islamic symbol instead of an American one on the crash site,
- in objecting to its pointing to Mecca and the terrorists’ intended target,
- in objecting to dishonoring the memory of the people who fought the terrorists on Flight 93
- in pointing out how Paul Murdoch cleverly and symbolically cast the passenger and crew out of the Islamic heavens in the design while the terrorists are inside the Islamic heavens
- in pointing out how the date and the site are dedicated to the terrorists
- in pointing out the numerous redundant mosque design features
- in pointing out the terrorist memorializing features
- and post along with us on Wednesdays,
please contact caoilfhionn1 at gmail dot com with your website url. She will, in turn, add you to the email list, send you the blogroll code (if you want to put it in your sidebar), and will send you the prewritten text to post. You should receive the email from Cao a day or two prior to the Wednesday it should be posted, and tracked back to Cao’s blog and Error Theory, if your blog has that capability. This will help us track who in the blogroll is posting the blogburst.
Stop the Memorial Blogburst
Tags: breaking the circle, entry portal, field of honor, flight 93 memorial, marble panels, mr murdoch, sacred ground, sept 11 2001, star flag, terrorists