Affirmative Action For Bad behavior
Jan 9, 2014 Political
I have had many issues with the way schools discipline children. Many schools jump right to suspension or expulsion for the most minor infractions when a whole host of other, more suitable, punishments are available. I have seen this applied to many children who misbehaved regardless of their skin color. Zero tolerance policies are certainly a factor in these punishments but often the school jumps to the toughest punishment when other options are available.
What does Eric Holder want to do about this? Well, one would think he might want to revamp the entire system so that children are judged on the merits of their individual case and not by a one size fits all standard but one would be wrong.
[note]I do not think the Attorney General should be involved in school issues and am not saying he has a responsibility here but since he thinks he does I address it from the point of view that if he is going to do something one might think it would be this…[/note]
Holder says that too many black kids are being suspended so he wants schools to stop doing that. He wants fairness in the punishment arena (which means being less strict on black kids) or schools might just face “strong action”.
The problem here is that the way punishment is handled in schools does not only affect black children nor are those children singled out because of color. All kids are affected by bad policy.
Eric would rather schools ignore the bad behavior of black children or treat them differently when they do something wrong. He seems to think punishing children who misbehave crates a pipeline from school to jail.
The pipeline from school to jail is created by a black community (which is what Holder is concerned about) that has a high incidence of single parent families, poverty and government dependence. The real issue is that children who are chronically bad are not being disciplined at home and Holder seems to want them not to be disciplined in school (or to have their punishments greatly reduced).
To Holder having children go unpunished for being bad is the way you teach them to be responsible adults. This seems to be a recurring theme for liberals as many engage in bad behavior and are rewarded.
There was a school district in Florida that did not punish black kids for being bad. The edict was put out to stop because too many black kids were being disciplined (like Holder claims). One young man was very bad in school and was in trouble a number of times. He was not disciplined very much because he was black and the school did not want to have bad statistics on the numbers of black kids disciplined.
That young man was named Trayvon Martin and think we all know how things turned out in his story…
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: affirmative action, eric holder, punishment, schools, trayvon martin, zero tolerance
Obama Administration Did Not Know?
Aug 22, 2013 Political
The news has been filled with stories about the Australian who was murdered by three teens who were either involved in some type of gang initiation or just bored (or both). Chris Lane was here as a student in Oklahoma and he was shot down by three thugs. The deputy White House press secretary Josh Earnest was asked about the murder and said he was not familiar with it.
When the case was explained to him he said it was tragic but that he did not want to get ahead of the legal process.
Really now?
Obama got ahead of the legal process when it involved Trayvon Martin. The police had investigated and found that Zimmerman did not violate the law. Obama opined about Martin looking like his son if he had one. Obama kept interjecting himself either directly or through his Justice Department.
The pressure from the race hustlers and the Obama Regime (but I repeat myself) led to a politically motivated witch hunt. Zimmerman was finally found not guilty but at the cost of millions and a setback for race relations.
Why would Obama worry about getting ahead of the process when it relates to the Lane murder?
Perhaps it has something to do with the race of the victim and the race of the shooter.
I find it very unlikely that Obama and his Regime knew nothing about the case. There is a pattern of selective outrage with this Regime and the outrage is only visible when the victim looks like a son Obama might have…
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: chris lane, lies, obama regime, race relations, trayvon martin, unaware
Kirstie Alley’s Liberal Side
Jul 23, 2013 Political
Many times Kirstie Alley has espoused views that would appear conservative or libertarian. She opposed Obamacare because we don’t have the money to pay for it (ignoring that government does not belong in the health care business) and she defended Clint Eastwood’s chair routine and said that media are biased in favor of Dems. However, she is misguided in her thoughts about violence and her hypocrisy demonstrates that while she is all over the board politically, she is very much a liberal with regard to justice and violence.
Liberalism is a mental disorder and should be classified as such in the DSM-V. The people who follow that ideology are confused and have no sense of reality. The effects of the disorder are often seen through the hypocritical positions liberals take. They will vehemently oppose something when a person from another party introduces it and then support it full tilt when it is introduced by their own party.
Harry Reid was very passionate about why the nuclear option should NOT be exercised when he was in the minority. Just recently he threatened to do exactly that which he opposed only a few short years ago.
Liberals screamed and hollered about George Bush and his illegal wars but said nary a word about Obama’s illegal use of the military (they called the wars illegal and they voted for them).
The very people who claimed time and again that Saddam Hussein had WMD told us how Bush lied when none were found.
To top it off the left screams for peace and hand holding but then protests and starts violence with those who disagree with them. They say that violence is not the answer and then physically attack people.
When the George Zimmerman verdict was announced actress Kirstie Alley tweeted:
White people used to make black people drink from separate fountains…Now we just shoot their children… [Twitchy]
So according to Ms. Alley (who belongs to the Scientology Cult) white people have evolved from separate but equal to violence against the children of blacks.
I guess she would want us to think she is a peaceful person. While I can understand the anguish over the death of a 17 year old kid (and I have already addressed the issue) I think it is moronic to make a blanket statement about whites like she did and I think that it is even more so considering blacks kill their own much more often than whites do.
But this peaceful woman who thinks it was tragic to kill a child who was beating the hell out of someone has no problem with violence against people she does not care for.
Fellow moron Kanye West had an altercation with the Paparazzi at the LA Airport and Ms. Alley “loves” it. She thinks it is great that Kanye went all whack on the Paparazzi.
In fact, she applauds anyone who takes a swing at them.
I do not know what happened with West and the Paparazzi but let us assume that the Paparazzi started the issue. West reacted and an altercation took place. Kirstie Alley is OK with that and applauds ANYONE who takes a swing at them.
She was not so supportive of George Zimmerman who defended himself when a big, strong, drugged up kid broke his nose and bashed his head on the concrete.
See how this works? Alley does not like the Paparazzi (who are just doing their jobs) so it is OK to take a swing at them.
To paraphrase this nut job, actors used to let photographers take pictures of them, now they just beat them up.
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: george zimmerman, kanye west, kirstie alley, liberalism, paparazzi, trayvon martin, violence
Imus Admit, Sharpton A Hypocrite
Jul 18, 2013 Commentary
Don Imus caught holy hell and lost his job because he uttered the phrase “nappy headed hoes” when talking about a basketball team of black women. Al Sharpton led the agitation brigade calling for Imus to be fired and pretty soon Imus was out of a job. It mattered not that Imus apologized directly to the women and that he admitted he should not have said it. None of it mattered because the race hustler Al needed another scalp to hang on his race baiting trophy rack.
This might be OK if Al was consistent in his views. Black kids murder black kids and Al does not care. White on black, well Al is rabble rousing the race brigade. Black person says the N word and Al is quiet (Jesse Jackson called blacks the N word saying Obama talked down to them) but let a white person say anything like it and all hell breaks loose.
The latest in the list of Al Sharpton hypocrisy is the way he dismissed the star witness in the Zimmerman prosecution, Rachel Jeantel who used the N word and then explained the difference between the word that ends with an “a” and the one that ends with “er”.
All this was OK with Al who claimed that this is just the way some of y’all talk.
Imagine if Imus had made the claim that this is just the way some folks talk? Imus stressed he was trying to make a joke and it turned out to be in very poor taste. Jeantel is running around discussing the N word and the appropriateness of its use and Sharpton is agreeing with her.
There has been no mention from Sharpton about Trayvon Martin’s use of the phrase “creepy ass cracka” which is a racist phrase. No, that must be OK in line with the way some of y’all talk.
It is amazing that Sharpton and the rest of the race hustlers along with the low information crowd are all focused on George Zimmerman and his statement to the dispatcher that these punks always get away with it. Zimmerman’s characterizations over the phone (none of which were even remotely racist) have been the subject of the race hustling crowd as proof that Zimmerman had hatred in his heart and profiled.
If I were to comment on Zimmerman’s words I would have to agree with Al;
That’s just the way some of y’all talk…
Ann Coulter has some sound advice regarding not being taken for a criminal
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: Al Sharpton, don imus, hypocrite, n word, rachel jeantel, trayvon martin
Would Zimmerman Adorn The Cover?
Jul 17, 2013 Political
But the thrill we’ve never known is the thrill that’ll getcha
Rolling Stone Magazine has a new face on the August cover and it is Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, the lone surviving Boston Marathon Bomber. Evidently the magazine did an article on the bomber and decided to put his picture on the cover.
When you get your picture on the cover of the Rollin’ Stone
This has not been well received by the commenting public as most see this as a slap in the face and an honor for the terrorist who murdered and maimed a number of people. You see, it used to be an honor to be pictured on the cover of the Rolling Stone.
(Stone…) Wanna buy five copies for my mother…(Yes)
I will admit that I have never bought the magazine and have only read a few articles from it when they were presented to me either online or by someone who had a copy.
(Stone…) Wanna see my smilin’ face
This guy, for some reason, has a following of people who appear to love him. He is a murderer who took the lives of a number of people and maimed many more. He disrupted the marathon, the nation, and the lives of the people involved. He is a puke who will be found guilty of murder and terrorism.
On the cover of the Rollin’ Stone…(That’s a very very good idea)
George Zimmerman was found Not Guilty of murder and manslaughter in the Trayvon Martin shooting. He seems to be more hated than the terrorist who took lives with intent to do so. People will make excuses for Tsarnaev (and blame America) while demonizing Zimmerman.
Do you suppose Rolling Stone would ever consider putting Zimmerman on the cover? I would bet if you asked them to do an article on him and put him on the cover they would think you were nuts.
How could we put Zimmerman on the cover? Why, that would turn our readers off? We would lose money.
But somehow the terrorist is OK?
I don’t get it. Like I stated, I have never bought it but the magazine has every right to put whomever it wants on the cover.
I just wonder how long this nation will survive when people like Tsarnaev are held in high regard by anyone at all while George Zimmerman lives in constant fear as a reviled murderer when he did nothing more than defend himself from the attack of a drug addled thug wannabe.
The embedded lyrics are from a song by Dr. Hook and the Medicine Show entitled The Cover of the Rolling Stone.
CVS Pharmacy will not sell the magazine.
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: cvs, dzhokhar tsarnaev, george zimmerman, rolling stone, terror, trayvon martin