Early Round Up Star Date 2021.251
Sep 8, 2021 Commentary, Tyranny, Vaccines
Note: Governments all over the world are using Covid as a pretense to impose authoritarian rule over their citizens. This is true in small municipalities all the way through to entire nations. A particularly egregious example is Australia. In 1783 the British sent a fleet of ships to Australia to establish a penal colony. Australia eventually grew out of that and became a nation. Now that country has come full circle and is once again a penal colony enforced by a police state. If you think that cannot happen here in the US, read on.
1. Many parts of the world are living in a vaccine economy and that includes jurisdictions in the US. People are singled out if they have not submitted to the vaccines and are not allowed to participate in the society that free people enjoy. They may not attend concerts or sporting events, go to restaurants or attend school. These are just a few of the things that are denied those who take a different decision regarding the vaccine. Some doctors and health care facilities are refusing to treat patients who are not vaccinated. In some places around the world people are not allowed to go shopping, including for essentials like groceries, if they are unvaccinated and this will soon be common practice in the US. How long before they decide the unvaccinated may not renew a driver’s license or a medical license or other professional license? How long before they decide you can’t vote if you are not vaccinated? The tyrants will use every method available, legal or not, to coerce people into getting the vaccine. They are firing the very health care heroes who worked with very sick patients in the absence of a vaccine simply because they will not get vaccinated. Tell me who will suffer from this. I can tell you that when your family member sits alone with no one to care for them you can blame the vaccine Nazis for it.
2. If you think that these mandates will not come to our shores you are mistaken. The ONLY reason they are not in place in California is because the governor there is facing a recall election. If he were to go full Commie on the state right now he would get beaten like a drum so he is delaying any draconian measures until after the recall. He figures he will win if he does nothing and then when he does he will impose lock downs, mandates, passports and all kinds of other liberty denying measures to coerce people into getting the Fauci Ouchie. If you live in California and do not want to live under the mandates of a tyrant then you need to yote YES to recall your governor. Remember, whatever he mandates for you to do he will not follow. He and his family along with their special friends will be able to do as they wish. He has already shown this to be the case.
3. Ivermectin is not just horse de-wormer. It is true that the drug was first put in the market in 1986 to treat cattle, sheep and other animals for parasitic infections BUT two years later it was approved for human use. The drug won a Nobel prize in 2015 and is listed as a WHO essential medication. The rare stories about people using the veterinary formulations show how desperate people will do what they think is best for them in order to treat the virus. The fact that they cannot calculate a human dose from the veterinary formulation is more of an indictment of our educational system than anything else. I am not advocating for anyone to use the veterinary formulation. The drug should be readily available for anyone who gets Covid. Despite the claims by the CDC and Dr. Fauci, there are plenty of studies as well as anecdotal evidence that the drug works in treating Covid. Look at the reduction in cases and deaths in India since that country introduced Ivermectin.
4. More on Ivermectin and the addition of hydroxychloroquine. Since the pandemic started I told you that HCQ was effective in treating Covid. I knew this because the NIH published a paper showing how effective HCQ was in treating SARS-CoV-1. The viruses are from the same family and work in similar ways (though the newest one was made in a lab) so the same drug should be effective for treating both. Many people were skeptical and of course Fauci said to follow the science (something he says and then ignores) and wait for studies. I pointed out that African nations where HCQ is routinely taken as malaria prophylaxis have lower death rates from Covid even though many are third world and do not have the level of and access to the kind of health care in more developed nations. Why is this? It is reasonable to assume that HCQ plays a part and that it should be investigated. But that can’t happen. You see, there would be no other treatment for Covid than the “vaccines”. Fauci and his minions wanted a vaccine and that was all we were going to get. Since vaccines take five to ten years to develop and test the only way to get these out sooner was through Emergency Use Authorization. You see, under US law the FDA can NOT issue and EUA for a medication if there is an approved medication that effectively treats the disease. If Fauci said Ivermectin and HCQ worked then the FDA could not issue an EUA for the experimental drugs. And they are experimental. These are mRNA drugs and that process has NEVER been used in making a vaccine. One would think that with it being new they would test it extensively before giving it to people but one would be wrong. All the people who got the shots are the experiment. You are the test group. They will look at you for years and if 5 or 10 years down the road millions of people develop life shortening and/or debilitating diseases they will say well, it did not work. And they will not be liable. Neither will the government. I think instead of calling those who did not get it the unvaccinated we should call them the control group. Of course government can get away with deception when it has a willing media wing.
5. The state of Texas passed a law that limits abortions up to the moment a fetal heartbeat is detected. This is usually four to six weeks. The left is up in arms and is saying that Texas violated the Constitution. Roe v. Wade made abortion a right out of whole cloth. I have discussed before how abortion is and always has been a state issue under the Tenth Amendment (as is marriage of any kind) but the feds made it a right out of whole cloth. So the left says that since it is a right you can’t restrict it. This has been progressive as the “right” originally had limits placed on it based on what trimester of pregnancy the mother was in. The left, over the years, has been able to move the limits up until seconds before birth where a child making its way down the birth canal may be murdered and extricated dead. Many states have placed limits on abortion and the courts have shot them down. My question is why? You see, the protection of the the right to keep and bear arms is actually written in the US Constitution. It is not made up and it is not some issue that one day appeared. It has existed since before we were a nation and the right is protected by the Second Amendment. Just to be clear, the 2A did not give a right, it protected a preexisting right. States routinely make laws restricting the right to keep and bear arms. In states like Maryland it is nearly impossible to get a carry permit (a permit infringes on the right). Courts routinely uphold some restrictions on the right to keep and bear arms and liberals applaud this and work harder to further restrict the right. So why is it unconstitutional for Texas or any other state to place limits on the “right” to an abortion? Now liberals, who are violent by nature, want to deputize doctors and send them to Texas to perform abortions. They want the federal government to send goons into the state to violate state law under the idea that the feds have immunity from prosecution. Texas allows people to carry firearms open or concealed and it has more people in it than he armed forces have in all the services combined. The feds will not be able to find enough doctors to deputize and if they somehow do they will be promptly arrested and given the same treatment as the people who were mostly peaceful on 6 January. If by chance the feds come in to throw their weight around they will soon find out how they got the saying “Don’t mess with Texas.” So go on libs, push your luck.
The only difference between Fetal and Fatal is Planned Parenthood…
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: HCQ, ivermectin, lies, tyranny, vaccine
Did FBI Murder LaVoy Finicum?
Jan 28, 2016 Commentary
For nearly a month a group of people describing themselves as militia have been occupying a federal wildlife refuge in protest of the federal government’s intrusion. The feds have obtained a lot of land in violation of the US Constitution and they have been putting ranchers out of business and obtaining their land along the way.
We can debate the tactics of the people and the sanity of this mission some other time. What is not open to debate is their adherence to non violence. They stated they would not shoot first but that they would not tolerate federal agents pointing guns at them. Their position was likely exploited and allowed the FBI to kill LaVoy Finicum. Many claim that Finicum did not shoot (in fact it has been reported that the only three shots came from law enforcement) and that he had his hands up when he approached the police.
I was obviously not there but if he intended to shoot someone I am sure he would have gotten a few rounds off and possibly harmed one of the LEOs before he was shot. He was not a threat to anyone’s life so why was lethal force used?
These officers had many more people, pepper spray and tazers. They did not have to shoot this guy, at least based on what we know at this time.
You can bet that no officer will face any discipline or investigation for this shooting, a shooting that looks like cold blooded murder.
Even if Finicum was charging at the police he did less to them than Michael Brown did (he assaulted an officer and then charged him and tried to take his gun) so why are there no protests? Why are there no hands up don’t shoot rallies and why are there no people telling us that cowboy lives matter?
Obama was on Brown’s side as was the majority of the liberal establishment. The very people who think Brown was executed think Finicum got what he deserved.
Did he? There is no way to convince me he could not have been taken alive. A trigger happy LEO murdered him.
The government can kill without consequence. We see it each and every day.
I do not know what the response to this will be but if this man was walking with his hands up and was unarmed and they shot him then the reaction should make Ferguson look like Disneyland.
Perhaps people should burn places to the ground and engage in huge riots that destroy millions of dollars in property. I mean, that is what happened in Ferguson and Baltimore and the subjects of those outbursts were in the wrong. If they murdered this guy (and it sure looks that way) then it might just be time to raise hell. There is no honor in the FBI and there is no honor in any police agency that violates its oath.
Perhaps this will spiral out of control or perhaps it will be forgotten in the next news cycle.
In any event, if you ever have to deal with the FBI or other law enforcement agencies just keep in mind they will murder you. Do what you have to to stay alive keeping in mind surrendering or complying is no guarantee you will remain alive.
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Should Monica Sue The Cigar Company?
Jan 13, 2016 2016 Election, Second Amendment, Tyranny
Hillary Clinton and the rest of the anti-gun zealots in this nation want the ability to sue gun manufacturers if their products are used in any manner that causes harm. One assumes they mean unlawful harm as I doubt anyone would want a gun manufacturer to be sued for a police officer that shot someone in the performance of his duty.
Regardless what they really want the entire idea is stupid. Firearms are manufactured and sold in this country. So long as the manufacturer provided them legally and they were not in some way defective then that manufacturer should not be held accountable for what the end user does with the product.
This is another overreach by the people who routinely violate the US Constitution. These people are tyrants and they will try everything they can, legal or not, in order to rule over people with an iron fist and they can’t quite do that until they can disarm people and make it tougher for them to get firearms.
How many firearms companies would go out of business if they could be sued because some moron uses a gun illegally and someone gets harmed? How many could stay in business if a legal owner shoots a home invader and the invader’s family sues the firearms company because the product caused harm?
It is moronic to hold the companies responsible in these instances.
The law in place has many provisions that would allow manufacturers to be sued but she [Hillary] wanted the version that allowed lawsuits for improper use of the gun by the end user (Sanders voted against that one and she is attacking him for it). Someone using the product in a manner that harms others SHOULD NEVER BE something a company can be sued for.
For those of you who think this is a good idea let me ask:
- Should Microsoft or Dell be sued if someone uses Microsoft software and a Dell computer to steal identities?
- Should Apple be sued because a person using a cell phone and not paying attention walks off a cliff?
- Should a sports company be sued because a person uses baseball bats to beat the hell out of people?
- Should condom companies be sued because rapists use their condoms when committing rape?
- Should a small appliance company be sued because an idiot used a hair dryer in the tub and died of electrocution?
The obvious answer to these questions is no. The companies did not do anything wrong and the companies did not use its products in a manner that harmed someone. This is just as true for the gun makers.
But guns are scary and liberal bed wetters do not like them so they have to have ways to do it. They don’t like guns so they want to sue the people who make them rather than go after the people who use them illegally.
This is the liberal mind set. It is never the fault of the person who did it. There must be some reason and the blame game begins. No matter what problems people have in life liberals will always find someone or something to blame for those problems. Look at any person in Baltimore picked up for a violent crime and that person has a record a mile long for other violent or gun related crimes (along with drugs) and the joker is still on the street. The problem is not some other thing, the problem is the person who did it and a liberal justice system that refuses to punish offenders.
Period!
But I am latching onto Hillary’s idea here. I think we should be allowed to sue politicians who enact laws and make decisions that harm the public. We should be able to sue the hell out of any politician who does anything that violates the Constitution.
Then we might get some reform in this country.
As for Hillary and suing gun makers, a stupid idea from a stupid person and makes as much sense as Monica suing the cigar company for the harm done to her…
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: gun control, Hillary, lawsuits, lies, manufacturers, nra, tyranny
Obama Assumes He Has The Power
Jan 4, 2016 Second Amendment
All tyrants do…
It is not hard to figure Barack Obama out. He was a drug using spoiled brat kid raised by Marxists and Communists who has grown into an adult who thinks he knows everything and that what he wants done is best for all. He also thinks that the Constitution and the laws do not apply to him and that he can ignore them as he sees fit.
This is evident in the actions he has taken. I will not list them for you. Suffice it to say any time he has used his pen and his phone or issued some executive action he was usurping his authority.
[note]It is important to note that Executive Orders do not have any weight of law for, and do not apply to, the citizens at large. They are orders for the EXECUTIVE BRANCH of the government and are designed to instruct that branch on what it must do. So when Obama tries to issue an EO telling us we must do this or that keep in mind his orders have no authority over you.[/note]
Obama met with Attorney General Lynch today and he then told reporters he has some actions he will take in the coming days. You know that they will infringe on our rights and be illegal by the way he described it.
He said the actions he is taking are completely within his legal authority. Anytime Obama says that he is trying to convince the dunderheads who support him that what he is doing is legal. IT IS NOT. He said that about a few things and the courts have told him otherwise. Remember, Obama told us he had the legal authority with regard to his immigration plans but a court told him otherwise. Of course that did not stop Obama the Tyrant as he ignored the courts.
He also said that a majority of people agree with him.
This is a lie. Congress took this issue up several times and the members of Congress decided against this based on what constituents were saying. People do not agree with Obama on this mess. People do not agree at all.
But, if that is the standard we now use then why is Obamacare the law? A huge majority of people were opposed to it when Obama and the Democrats were debating it and when they passed it. If Barack Obama actually cared about what the people wanted he would have scrapped Obamacare.
He did not because that is what he wanted. This is the same for his gun control measures. He wants this so he really does not care what the people want. He will tell the world that the majority agrees with him but that is a lie.
Obama lies to get his way and he ignores the Supreme Law of the Land. He bypasses Congress and he does things the way he wants and he really does not care if anyone likes it or if it is legal. It is what his magnificence wants so that is what he will do.
Well Barry, you ignore the law and that is fine with you and your idiot followers. Even Martin O’Malley thinks you did the right thing on this issue and you can’t get more of an idiot following you than O’Malley so let me be clear.
I will not obey any order you impose. I will NOT follow anything you say I have to do. I do not care if you like it because you work for me and I am not obligated to follow unconstitutional laws and since you have no authority to even make law I am certainly not going to follow what your pea brain comes up with.
So go fornicate yourself because we will not comply.
MOLON LABE
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: executive action, gun control, lies, Second Amendment, tyranny
Maryland Gun Control, Absolute Failure
Dec 9, 2015 Second Amendment
We are well aware of the failures of places with tough gun control laws. Chicago has thousands of shootings this year and it is nearly impossible to legally own a firearm there. California’s gun control failure was on display in San Bernardino last week when Muslim terrorists murdered a bunch of defenseless people.
Maryland is not far behind the crowd of gun control hell holes where criminals get guns and murder people while the law abiding are denied their protected right and are treated like the criminal class.
Martin O’Malley, former governor and presidential candidate, is responsible for pushing through these restrictive and unconstitutional laws. He relished in the moment and thought it would increase his bona fides with the liberal base. O’Malley, like his fellow Democrats, called for more gun control exploiting the dead while they were still warm and before all the facts were known.
The reality is these people were defenseless because their government made them so. The reaction of those in charge is to increase security from unarmed guards to armed guards. The only folks that there was no mention of arming are those who will suffer at the hands of bad people, the citizens.
It has been nearly two years since Maryland passed all the tough gun control. Baltimore City has over 300 murders this year, most of them with firearms and there are plenty more shootings where people were only injured. Perhaps the criminals did not get the memo about gun control because they keep getting guns and they keep using them.
Case in point, the first line from a Baltimore Fox 45 (WBFF) article indicates that police have taken two more guns off the street. They arrested two men who were involved in drug distribution and each of them had a gun. The article clearly indicates that neither of them was legally allowed to possess a gun and yet, they both had one.
You see, criminals do not obey the law, period. It is against the law to murder people and yet that happens. What makes anyone think that gun control laws will keep criminals from getting guns?
In fact, the two who were arrested had 200 bags of cocaine in their possession and I know that possessing, buying, selling or using cocaine is against the law.
Anyone see a pattern here?
Gun laws only affect the law abiding and they make us sitting ducks for those who have no regard for the law or for human life.
Martin O’Malley brought this to Maryland (mostly the urban areas as most of the suburbs are full of conservative people who own guns and obey the law) and now he wants to bring it to the nation.
I have no time and no desire to be lectured about guns by people like O’Malley particularly ones who are protected by armed guards.
MOLON LABE
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: baltimore, criminals, gun control, lies, morons, O'Malley, tyranny