Late Round Up Star Date 2021.306
Nov 2, 2021 Commentary, Political, Tyranny
1. Juan Williams thinks blacks do not have parental rights and the mere mention of that is a racist dog whistle. I understand there is an election in Virginia for the Governor’s office and Juan, being the good little liberal toady he is, must support the failed moron McAuliffe but come on Juan. For years schools begged parents to join the PTA and to get involved in education and now that parents are the left is upset. This stems from opposition to Critical Race Theory, a misguided lesson plan that tells young children that if they are white they are oppressors and if they are black they are oppressed. It rewrites history to impose things on our children that should not happen and parents, OF ALL COLORS, are upset by it. Juan does not see it that way because he must toe the party line and that means finding racism in everything not involving democrats. If he did he would oppose Joe “Poopy Pants” Biden and current Virginia governor Ralph “Black Face” Northrum. It is time to dispense with this nonsense. Parents have every right to decide what their children are taught and if they do not want racism instilled or sexually explicit books allowed then that is how it should be. Then again, I imagine these liberals are a bit uninformed since they usually send their children to private schools…
2. Is Kyle Rittenhouse getting a proper defense? The teen is charged with murder for defending himself against an angry mob of left wing rioters who attacked him. He shot three people who attacked him and two of them died. This is self defense and there should be no question BUT his defense is not allowing people who are experts in jury selection (Think Bull?) and there is fear he will be convicted by a jury with an agenda. To me this young man is a hero. He was armed and he was there to help. Then the BLM/Antifa mob attacked and he retreated. When he could not retreat he shot his attackers. He tried to turn himself into police but they were too busy. If he goes to jail then we might need all gun owners to riot and burn Kenosha to the ground. I mean, that is the approved way to handle grievances, right?
3. In unrelated firearm news, Palmetto State Armory out of South Carolina is selling AR 15 lower receivers with the phrase Let’s Go Brandon on them and the words that phrase means in the selector lever positions. Firearms enthusiasts will know what that means. After Biden pooped his pants they put out a lower receiver with a poop emoji and the words Potus Shatus Vatipants (he messed his pants at the Vatican). The selector lever positions are See da Pope, See da Poop and DA Pends. An NBC reporter reported the company to the Secret Service because, you know, you cannot mock Dear Leader in the Dem-Commie society. Well all I have to say is Let’s Go Brandon and the horse he rode in on…
4. From the BS with wishful thinking department, several major networks interviewed Huma Abedin, Hillary Clinton’s sometimes caretaker, in order to discuss a new book the liberal wrote. The media determined that Abedin was responsible for Hillary losing the last election because of the emails that ended up on her then horn dog husband’s computer resulting in James Comey reopening the investigation. According to the media Hillary would be into her second term if it were not for poor Huma….
5. The reality is the Dem-Commies thought they had the 2016 election in the bag so they did not ramp up the cheating machine at a high level. Trump was supposed to be easily dispatched by Hillary until he wasn’t. The 2020 election was full of criminal acts and fraudulent ballots in order to make sure the same result did not happen. They ran a tired, old, 50 year DC insider with dementia and were able to cheat him to victory. Regardless of what Dem-Commies tell you there was a lot of cheating and fraud and it all resulted in Trump losing an election he clearly won. Now there are investigations into specific people in Arizona. I will hold my thoughts until they actually arrest and charge someone with the fraud and I will be further satisfied when they convict those people. Until then it is all talk.
6. I would be wary of the election in Virginia if McAuliffe wins. They had planned 300k late ballot drop but the ballots got hung up in the mail. The Dem-Commies are suing the USPS over it. I also know that Virginia is accepting mail in ballots that do not contain the proper items. They must have the last 4 of the SSN but those without are being accepted. This is a violation of the law but a court dismissed it on lack of standing. The law is specific over who can make such a challenge. So why didn’t that happen? It is almost as if the right is OK with the Dem-Commies cheating. Youngkin should win so look out for the huge swings as fraudulent ballots are introduced.
7. But there is no voting fraud, right? In one Wisconsin County more than 23,000 registered voters had the same phone number and more than 4,000 had the same date of registration. Some were reported to have registered in 1916 and 1918 making them well over 100 years of age. It would appear as if the rolls are dirty there and they usually stay that way so the Dem-Commies can use these fraudulent voters to submit fraudulent ballots (or more accurately, someone can submit on their behalf). People do not live be 120+ years old. Then again, the dead always did vote Democrat. Biden might have gotten 81 million votes but only about 50 million of them were legitimate.
8. If I were on that jury he would not be guilty. A father admitted to killing the boyfriend of his daughter. The boyfriend sold her into sex trafficking. The father was able to rescue his daughter and then he killed the person responsible. I have a daughter and I do not know what I would do if she were harmed like this but I know it would be the unleashing of a hell like some have never seen. They might never find the person and I would not plead guilty. In any event, I would never vote to convict this guy should I be one of the people selected to sit on his jury. Then again, if he pled guilty a jury will probably not be there to decide…
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: biden, elections, lies, poopy pants, votes
The Troops Will Lose Out Again
May 10, 2016 2016 Election, Military
It seems like every election cycle our troops are disenfranchised. We can send them and their equipment around the world but can’t seem to get their ballots to them and back in time to be counted. Every election liberals look for reasons to exclude the vote of the military. There is a reason for this, the military tends to overwhelmingly vote Republican.
They will get screwed again this year:
In a new survey of American military personnel, Donald Trump emerged as active-duty service members’ preference to become the next U.S. president, topping Hillary Clinton by more than a 2-to-1 margin. However, in the latest Military Times election survey, more than one in five troops said they’d rather not vote in November if they have to choose between just those two candidates. Military Times
If surveys showed the military voted overwhelmingly Democrat the left would bend over backwards to ensure the votes were cast and counted. You know, like they do for criminals…
Perhaps the government should work as hard protecting the votes of our military (those who protect the nation and our freedom) as it does to get the vote for felons (and illegals)…
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: disenfranchise, felons, liberals, lies, Military, votes
Too Little Too Late
Nov 19, 2013 Obamacare, Political
A new poll by the Washington Post/ABC News shows that if the 2012 election were held today Mitt Romney would have an edge over Barack Obama 49-45. Perhaps this is because the lie Obama told to get reelected has now been revealed and millions of Americans are getting screwed because of it.
There were lots of lies by Obama in 2012 and we are seeing that many of the things Romney predicted, which were dismissed by Obama and his obedient media, have come true. Romney was right about foreign affairs and he was right about millions of people losing their health insurance. Obama dismissed all of this and he received cover from the media that was so eager to see him reelected.
This change of heart among voters is too little too late. They needed to be engaged before the last election and they needed to do their own research. They needed to cut through the bull and recognize that Obama was not being truthful.
Instead millions of voters were either eager to get their free health insurance (which is not so free) or were happy to keep what they had voted for Obama because he said things they liked and he was not some evil Republican.
Mitt Romney was not the most ideal candidate for the job but he was many times better than Obama. Mitt got things right while Obama lied to get reelected.
It is obvious that Obama knew he was lying but did it in order to continue his path of destruction in America.
There are a lot of liberals who voted for Obama who are now lying in that path of destruction. They have been used and are now discarded and suffering the consequence of Obama’s lies.
Democrats loved to tell us that Romney lived in the past and his ideas were decades old. While this characterization was off the mark one can only wonder how much better off we would be if we lived based on the lessons of the past.
One thing is certain; America’s future under Obama will not be so good.
But hey, at least they have their Obamaphones…
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Requesting ID Is Racist?
Jun 10, 2012 Political
Eric Holder and the other race hustlers on the left have convinced people that requiring ID to vote is racist and disenfranchises people. This flies in the face of reality because many of the people who would allegedly be disenfranchised have ID. None of them ever cry about needing ID to get welfare or board a plane, buy liquor or tobacco products or any of the dozens of other things that an ID is needed for.
No, they happily provide ID and no one ever cries about racism or being disenfranchised.
This is all a smoke screen to protect those who should not vote but do and the reason is simple. Those folks vote for Democrats. Democrats know that requiring an ID to vote would cost them votes. This is not racism and it is not disenfranchising. It is simply ensuring the law is followed and that the one person one vote principle is followed so long as the one person is legally allowed to vote. It is quite simple and is no more an impediment to voting than requiring an ID to buy alcohol is an impediment to those who are legally allowed to drink.
You know that it is all a sham and it is easy to see. One must present an ID to get into the building where Eric Holder works.
One must present an ID to get into the Democrat Convention.
And one must provide an ID to get a book signed by Michelle Obama.
This is all an elaborate game designed to protect those among us who break the law by voting when they are not allowed to do so. The Democrats want to protect their base and they want to ensure they get as many votes as possible whether they are legal or not.
If they really think IDs are racist and that it disenfranchises people to request an ID then perhaps they would take things further by removing ID requirements all together. No more ID to buy alcohol or tobacco, no more ID to enter government buildings, no ID to enter the Democrat Convention and no ID to get on a plane.
That will never happen but Democrats will fight tooth and nail to keep states from requiring an ID to vote.
Their hypocrisy never ends.
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit
Tags: eric holder, laws, lies, michelle obama. id, votes
Unions Oppose Voter ID Except When It Is A Union Vote
Mar 12, 2012 Political
Imagine you belong to a union and that union is voting on something (contract, leadership, etc). You arrive at the union hall which belongs to the union and its members. Before you are allowed to vote you must show an ID. Why? What are the odds that the people in the room are not part of the union? Could they really get so many non union folks in there to affect the outcome of the vote without someone noticing they don’t belong? If there is any place where the likelihood of voter fraud is low it is in a union hall (with regard to non members voting, all kinds of fraud takes place in unions) so why is an ID required?
Better yet, why do the same unions that require an ID to vote in its processes oppose voter ID laws with regard to our state political elections?
The unions oppose voter ID when the general population is voting in political elections even though the potential (and actual) fraud is much higher than could ever be expected in a union hall where ID is required.
The reason is pretty simple. The unions do not want voter ID laws because those laws would keep the unions from committing voter fraud. The unions are heavily vested in the Democrat Party and the unions do a lot of fraudulent things. They intimidate people who are campaigning, they intimidate people who vote, and they help the dead get to the polls while also ensuring there are an adequate number of “extra” votes for the people they want to win.
Democrats and unions are one in the same. The same philosophy, same criminal activity, and same voter fraud (ACORN anyone) found in unions are found in the Democrat Party. They work hand in hand because unions work to get Democrats elected and then Democrats work to transfer taxpayer money to the unions. The violation of law leading to investors being shafted while unions took ownership of auto companies was a payoff and this kind of stuff happens all the time.
Since Democrats and unions are the same it should come as no surprise that Democrats oppose voter ID. Eric “The Red” Holder and his Justice Department just put the nix on a Texas voter ID law because of the phony claim that it might disproportionately affect Hispanics. Evidently, all those Hispanics in Texas who have jobs do not have ID. Evidently, all the Hispanics in Texas who receive welfare or drive a car do not have a valid ID. I can’t imagine how so many people could be affected by this law but evidently in Texas they let people work, drive, or receive welfare without an ID.
Let me tell you the real concern of Holder and the Obama regime. They are worried that a voter ID law would keep illegals from voting in elections and those would be lost Democrat votes. Illegals are not allowed to vote and ID laws would prevent more of them from doing so and this is a non starter for the Obama regime. The regime needs the illegals and all the other votes it can get in Texas because it is a very red state that contains a lot of electoral votes.
I know Texas is under special scrutiny because of past discrimination as are a few other states. It always seemed arbitrary to me because there are states not subject to the scrutiny and they were as discriminatory as any on the list.
Be that as it may, the argument that the law is discriminatory to Hispanics does not hold water. The Supreme Court has already ruled that a similar law in another state is Constitutional.
But Holder has pressed on with his crusade against voter ID.
He knows that those laws will likely be upheld by the SCOTUS (because they already have) but the legal process takes time.
And Holder only needs to delay until after this November.
If we are lucky, he will be in jail by then…
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: eric holder, justice, lies, texas, union, voter id, votes