Police Can See Inside Your Home; Hannity Torn On Issue
Jan 21, 2015 Commentary, General
A report from USA Today from 20 January 2015 indicates that at least fifty police agencies are using a new radar device that allows officers to see if people are inside homes and if they are moving around. These agencies are using the devices, shall I say, under the radar.
The officers use the device to violate the right of the people inside to their privacy. Courts have ruled that officers must get a warrant to do such a thing but these officers are not getting those warrants.
Their reports do not mention that they used the device to determine someone was in a structure instead opting to report that an anonymous source reported it or there was reasonable suspicion.
On his radio program last evening Sean Hannity discussed this technology and said he was torn on the issue because officers who are going to a structure that might have dangerous people in it need to know how many and if they are moving around. It is, according to Hannity, all about the safety of those officers. Hannity has been willing to cede some rights in the name of police or some law in the past. He claims to be conservative but has no trouble allowing for a police state in some cases…
There is no doubt that the safety of officers needs to be taken into consideration. I only wish that the safety of the building occupants mattered as much to agencies and people like Hannity. How often are people harmed during a raid (and how often is it the wrong house)?
In any event, there is a simple solution and since Hannity claims to be solutions oriented he should buy into it.
GET A WARRANT.
I was under the impression the police had to stay a certain distance from your property anyway. But even if they are allowed to just trespass and walk up to your house they certainly are not allowed to use devices to search the inside (and that is what this is).
If they have probable cause to be there then getting a warrant should be easy. If they can’t get the warrant it is likely they should not be at the house in the first place. If there is no proof of wrongdoing then being there amounts to a fishing expedition where officers are looking for a reason to be able to enter. If they are there to make an entry then it should be easy to include the radar in the warrant.
I, unlike Hannity, do not want to give up my right to privacy. My home belongs to me and if you want to search it (by entering or with a device) then you need a warrant.
Period.
No need to be torn Sean. Tell them that you believe in officer safety BUT they need to get a warrant.
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Where Are They Now?
Dec 5, 2010 Political
No, this is not a segment about obscure music artists or actors. It is a search for the liberals/progressives who had their panties in a wad over spying on citizens by the US government when George Bush was in charge. The left went bonkers over the Patriot Act and some of its provisions even though they were deemed legal and with merit. That did not stop the left from rising up and using its partner in the ACLU to demonize the practices of our government.
For what its worth, I find some parts of the Act troubling but there are other parts (those dealing with known terrorists outside our borders) that have merit and have been upheld by the courts.
The Obama Justice Department has gone even further and is tracking Americans via their credit use.
The document, obtained by security researcher Christopher Soghoian, explains how so-called “Hotwatch” orders allow for real-time tracking of individuals in a criminal investigation via credit card companies, rental car agencies, calling cards, and even grocery store loyalty programs. The revelation sheds a little more light on the Justice Department’s increasing power and willingness to surveil Americans with little to no judicial or Congressional oversight. Wired
The Obama Justice Department has increased its own power with little or no judicial or Congressional oversight.
Isn’t this what the left railed about with regard to Bush? Wasn’t the left upset about increasing power in the Executive Branch with no oversight?
Seems that as long as a Democrat is abusing power it is quite alright.
I have no problem tracking people who are under investigation but there are legal ways to do that and warrants are required to do things like listen to phone conversations and track credit cards. And what assurance do we have they are not tracking those who happen to disagree with their agenda?
So once again I ask, where are they now?
Cave Canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
[tip]If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.[/tip]
Tags: credit card, justice department, lies, warrants